Previous | Front Page Download report |
Next |
National Trends Figure 1 on the following page provides national averages (weighting for population size) for the eight prosperity indicators for cities and suburbs. It shows that the average suburb greatly outpaced the average city on such measures of economic health as median household income ($50,175 vs. $36,535), per capita income ($24,210 vs. $20,291), and percentage of homeowners (72.6% vs. 50.4%). Cities have more than double the poverty rate of suburbs (18.2% vs. 8.6%), over a third more unemployment (8% vs. 5%), and more vacant housing (8.1% vs. 6.6%). The figure also shows (along the left-hand axis) the cities performance as a ratio to that of the suburbs. For example, cities median income was only .73 as high as suburbs, while suburban poverty was only .47 as high as cities. We use these ratios later in this report as a way to summarize disparities on each indicator. There is some good news. Cities and suburbs are close to equal on percentages of college educated (27% vs. 26%) and those working in professional managerial jobs (35.5% vs. 34%). On both indicators the city-suburb ratio is .95, near parity. It is likely that the similarity between city and suburb on these indicators is related to their different age composition. Recent college and professional school graduates between the ages of 22 and 35 often live in cities rather than suburbs as they begin their careers. This changes the educational and occupational profile of city residents, but does not have as much effect on income or homeownership. Regional Differences: City-Suburb Disparities Smaller in the South and West Table 1 shows how cities performed on each indicator compared to suburbs in different regions of the country. Cities in the South and West clearly fared better than those in the Northeast and Midwest.
|
Previous | Front Page Download report |
Next |